More important than these similarities, however, are the distinctions. ERCOT has far larger gas-fired generation capacity and requires publishing of detailed wind generation data that, when combined with CEMS data, enables precise definition of wind events, thus facilitating a better understanding of the emission implications of wind use.
Since the wind blows at night when gas generation is relatively low as a percent of total generation, coal plants are cycled, producing more SO2, NOX, and CO2 than would have been the case had those coal plants not been cycled. In addition, hourly generation and emissions data are available through the CEMS system.
Due to the availability of the minute generation data, wind event details can be calculated more precisely. The frequency of cycling events in ERCOT is captured within this section along with a case study covering a 1-day period. Every day, as wind increases between p. On some days, such as November 9 and 10, coal generation drops significantly, but even on days of limited wind such as November 8, wind appears to push a small amount of coal generation offline. The solid bars indicate the number of wind-induced cycle events. The shaded portion represents cycling events not related to wind.
- Tourists and travellers : womens non-fictional writing about Scotland, 1770-1830;
- Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials: Theory, Modelling and Applications?
- Plane and solid geometry : with problems and applications.
The categories capture the sizes of the events. For example, the first category — MW indicates that the number of times total coal-fired generation increased from to MW from hour to hour. This data indicates that most coal cycling in Texas is due to wind generation and that the number of wind-induced cycling instances is increasing rapidly.
- Retail Certificate Workbook?
- Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Series.
- Search form?
- Download Multiphase Flow Handbook Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering Series !
- Download Multiphase Flow Handbook Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering Series 2006.
- Single- and Multiphase Flow for Electronic Cooling;
- Shop now and earn 2 points per $1.
The incremental growth in appears to have had a more profound impact on the incidence of cycling than did the larger growth in This suggests that the impact of wind is cumulative: the more wind that comes on the system, without corresponding additions of other generation forms, the more wind-induced coal cycling results. Emission Impacts: J. Little wind generation was present on the morning of November 8. As a result, coal-fired generation produced power consistently throughout the morning until late evening.
ISBN 10: 0849312809
Coal units were cycled throughout that day to accommodate wind generation. One coal-fired plant was chosen to illustrate the impact of coal cycling. The J. Deeley plant was one of the plants that accommodated the wind on November 8—9. The graphic shows a sharp drop in generation, beginning about p. SO2 initially followed suit and fell until generation began to rise about a. After that, SO2 rose with increased generation and did not flatten out when generation reached its peak around a.
Deeley plant generation and emissions on November 8—9, NOX and CO2 both rose slightly as coal generation fell, but, as the generation came back online, emissions quickly returned to and held at their pre-event levels. Emission rates for SO2, CO2, and NOX rose significantly immediately after Deeley generation was cycled and decreased as generation was brought back online. SO2 rates did not return to their pre-event levels until late in the day.
Interestingly, when generation dropped around p. In comparison to November 8, emission rates on November 9 are significantly higher. If generation at Deeley remained constant instead of variable on November 9, the emission rates would have been similar to those of November 8. The stable day rates evidenced on November 8 before the wind event were used to calculate avoided emissions and then compared to the actual emissions from November 9. Cycling J. Deeley to compensate for wind generation produced more SO2 and NOX emissions than would have been generated if the plant generated the same amount of power at a flat level.
Due to cycling, J. Deeley plant generation and emission rates, November 8—9, Deeley plant generation, November 9, Operating these facilities irregularly or at nondesign levels leads to inefficient operation and higher emission levels. Identifying days when wind generation resulted in the cycling of coal units allowed for a precise understanding of the emission impacts.ufn-web.com/wp-includes/96/logiciel-despionnage-pour-telephone-portable.php
The gravity and frequency of these events increased as more wind generation was introduced to the system. This mirrors the results found on the PSCO system, supporting the theory that increased rates of cycling arise from the incremental integration of wind generation. Furthermore, these wind-driven, coal-cycling events resulted in significantly more SO2 and NOX emissions than if wind generation had not been utilized.
The same results were found on the PSCO system. When wind generation comes online, generation from coal and natural gas-fired plants is curtailed until the wind subsides, then nonwind generation is again ramped up to meet demand. Cycling coal units in this manner drives their heat rates up and their operating efficiencies down, emitting more SO2, NOX, and CO2 than would have been emitted if the units had not been cycled.
Two caveats must be understood when interpreting these results. First, we found no instances in which PSCO violated any of its air permits as a result of cycling coal. Furthermore, the study authors are not suggesting that PSCO violated its permits in extrapolating the case study results to estimate annual emissions.
The second caveat pertains to the data. Thus, it was possible to precisely identify wind events based on a sudden decline in coal generation coupled with a simultaneous increase in wind generation. Subsidiary conclusions based on our analysis include: Duration — Cycling coal-fired power plants has short- and long-term impacts.
This study concludes that the impacts frequently have much longer durations. Many instances were found where cycling caused bag houses and other pollution controls to lose their calibration and take as long as 12 to 15 hours, sometimes as long as 24 hours, to settle back to pre-event emission rates. During these periods, emission rates normally exceeded what would be experienced if the plants ran at stable generation levels.
- Microsoft Outlook Version 2002 Inside Out?
- MAE Graduate Courses.
- DMSP OLS global composites.
- Navigation menu.
- Shop by category.
- Waves and Structures in Nonlinear Nondispersive Media: General Theory and Applications to Nonlinear Acoustics.
Timing — Wind-induced coal-plant cycling appears to be a night-time phenomenon. Nonwind renewable implications — Coal-cycling issues do not appear to impact solar and other nonwind renewable energy forms.
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Series | Tanum nettbokhandel
Solar energy is generated during daylight, thus coinciding with natural gas-fired generation. When solar energy peaks, the likelihood is much greater that natural gas-fired generation can be cycled to accommodate the energy. Generation mix — Composition of the generation stack is a critical factor.
In the PSCO context, this means the coal plants supplemented with some combined-cycle natural gas and hydro are in operation. The extra emissions result because the RPSmandated must-take wind resources exceed the quantity of power generated from combined cycle gas. Increasing the proportion of baseload generated by more flexible generation equipment such as natural gas-fired combined cycle plants and stored energy sources will enable systems to absorb wind without having to cycle their coal plants.
The RPS standard requires that more wind resources be utilized than can be offset with lower-emission, natural gas generation equipment. Without substantially more natural gas generation added to the PSCO system, the emission increases documented in this study will rise, further enlarging the degree to which Denver and the Front Range violate the State Implementation Plan limitations.
National implications — Congress is considering legislation that would mandate a federal RPS.
The results of this study should not be interpreted as a critique of wind energy. Rather, they suggest modifications to its development to ensure that the benefits are more fully realized. Current RPS standards mandate that wind is a must-take resource and other generation facilities must be cycled to accommodate it. If utilities have sufficient variable generation facilities online to avoid cycling their coal units, these RPS provisions work well.
However, where these conditions are lacking, alternative approaches are required to avoid cycling coal plants. The alternatives might include construction of additional variable generation sources such as natural gas and stored energy systems, the imposition of additional emission controls on coal units to make them more flexible, or changing dispatch orders. Whatever the approach, care must be taken that imposition of the RPS does not exacerbate ozone and other air quality issues. Bentek Energy. April 16, Evergreen, CO.
Prepared by EnerNex Corporation. Appendix B. Antoine, M. Matsko, and P.
Multiphase Flow Handbook
November Vierstra, S. Retrieved from XcelEnergy. Energy is stored as the potential of water raised against gravity. Stated simply, water is pumped through a turbine from a lower reservoir afterbay to a higher reservoir forebay and the activity uses energy. When it is desirable to have that energy or water returned, the water is allowed to flow back through a turbine from the higher reservoir forebay to the lower reservoir afterbay and vice versa.
The electric grid of tomorrow must exhibit flexibility in load and generation management. This variability is one of the costs for decreased emissions and increased fossil fuel savings. How can utility companies and other energy providers manage increased variability?